|
|
| Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Las Brujas. Por información adicional contacte bibliolb@inia.org.uy. |
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas; INIA Tacuarembó. |
Fecha : |
21/12/2020 |
Actualizado : |
21/12/2020 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Autor : |
FERRINHO, A.M.; PERIPOLLI, E.; BANCHERO, G.; PEREIRA, A.S.C.; BRITO, G.; LA MANNA, A.; FERNANDEZ, E.; MONTOSSI, F.; KLUSKA, S.; MUELLER, L.F.; BERCHIELLI, T.T.; BALDI, F. |
Afiliación : |
ADRIELLE MATIAS FERRINHO, Faculdade de Zootecnia e Engenharia de Alimentos, Universidade de São Paulo, Pirassununga, SP, Brazil; Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia-Ciencia Animal, Viçosa, MG, Brazil; ELISA PERIPOLLI, Departamento de Zootecnia, Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil; GEORGGET ELIZABETH BANCHERO HUNZIKER, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ANGÉLICA SIMONE CRAVO PEREIRA, Faculdade de Zootecnia e Engenharia de Alimentos, Universidade de São Paulo, Pirassununga, SP, Brazil; GUSTAVO WALTER BRITO DIAZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ALEJANDRO FRANCISCO LA MANNA ALONSO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ENRIQUE GENARO FERNANDEZ RODRIGUEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; FABIO MARCELO MONTOSSI PORCHILE, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; SABRINA KLUSKA, Departamento de Zootecnia, Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil; LENISE FREITAS MUELLER, Faculdade de Zootecnia e Engenharia de Alimentos, Universidade de São Paulo, Pirassununga, SP, Brazil; TELMA TERESINHA BERCHIELLI, Dpto Zootecnia, Fac. Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, Univ. Estadual Paulista, SP, Brazil; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico, Brasília, DF, Brazil; Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia-Ciencia Animal, Viçosa, MG, Brazil; FERNANDO SEBASTIAN BALDI REY, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
Título : |
Effect of growth path on carcass and meat-quality traits of Hereford steers finished on pasture or in feedlot. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2020 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Animal Production Science, 2020, Volume 60, Issue 2, Pages 323-332. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1071/AN18075 |
ISSN : |
1836-0939 |
DOI : |
10.1071/AN18075 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Article history: Received 30 January 2018 / Accepted 14 May 2019 / Published online 4 December 2019.
Funding information:
This work was supported by Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP grant #2016/22022-4 and #2011/21241-0), Brazil, and the National Institute of Agricultural research (INIA) of Uruguay. |
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of nutritional management during rearing and finishing phases on beef fatty acid composition, and carcass and beef quality traits of Hereford cattle. The study used 240 castrated male calves weaned at 8 months of age, and with an average weight of 170 ± 17 kg. After weaning, the experiment was divided in to three phases in a 4 × 2 factorial design: a 93-day winter period with four treatment groups (on pasture or in feedlot and at high or low feeding levels); a 196-day compensatory-growth phase on pasture; and a finishing phase either on pasture or in feedlot. Animals were slaughtered when each group attained a mean liveweight of 500 kg. The winter growth × finishing management interaction significantly affected hot carcass weight (P = 0.0029). There was no differences observed for feedlot-finished steers, but for pasture-finished steers, those pasture-reared had higher hot carcass weight (kg) than those feedlot-reared (low pasture 256.30 ± 1.60, high pasture 253.72 ± 1.60, low feedlot 249.85 ± 1.66, high feedlot 247.60 ± 1.62). Feedlot-finished steers showed higher (P < 0.05) mean values than pasture-finished steers for ribeye area (55.61 ± 0.69 cm2 vs 53.18 cm2), backfat thickness (8.62 ± 0.32 mm vs 6.21 mm), marbling score (237.97 ± 13.06 vs 171.70) and final pH (5.53 ± 0.02 vs 5.48). Additionally, feedlot-finished steers raised in feedlot during the winter-growth period displayed the heaviest hindquarter cuts. Meat from pasture-finished steers had lower (P < 0.05) shear-force values than from feedlot-finished cattle (2.95 ± 0.18 vs 3.66 ± 0.17 kg), and when reared on either high or low pasture during winter-growth, they showed the highest (P < 0.05) conjugated linoleic acid (cis-9, trans-11) and n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid concentrations. In conclusion, growing and finishing cattle on pasture improved the carcass yield of retail cuts because of low fat concentration, and improved the nutritional and health value of the beef fatty acid profile.
© 2020 CSIRO. MenosABSTRACT.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of nutritional management during rearing and finishing phases on beef fatty acid composition, and carcass and beef quality traits of Hereford cattle. The study used 240 castrated male calves weaned at 8 months of age, and with an average weight of 170 ± 17 kg. After weaning, the experiment was divided in to three phases in a 4 × 2 factorial design: a 93-day winter period with four treatment groups (on pasture or in feedlot and at high or low feeding levels); a 196-day compensatory-growth phase on pasture; and a finishing phase either on pasture or in feedlot. Animals were slaughtered when each group attained a mean liveweight of 500 kg. The winter growth × finishing management interaction significantly affected hot carcass weight (P = 0.0029). There was no differences observed for feedlot-finished steers, but for pasture-finished steers, those pasture-reared had higher hot carcass weight (kg) than those feedlot-reared (low pasture 256.30 ± 1.60, high pasture 253.72 ± 1.60, low feedlot 249.85 ± 1.66, high feedlot 247.60 ± 1.62). Feedlot-finished steers showed higher (P < 0.05) mean values than pasture-finished steers for ribeye area (55.61 ± 0.69 cm2 vs 53.18 cm2), backfat thickness (8.62 ± 0.32 mm vs 6.21 mm), marbling score (237.97 ± 13.06 vs 171.70) and final pH (5.53 ± 0.02 vs 5.48). Additionally, feedlot-finished steers raised in feedlot during the winter-growth period displayed the heaviest hindquarter cut... Presentar Todo |
Palabras claves : |
Carry-over effects; Fatty-acid profile; Finishing system; Growth-out. |
Asunto categoría : |
L01 Ganadería |
Marc : |
LEADER 03376naa a2200337 a 4500 001 1060696 005 2020-12-21 008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 022 $a1836-0939 024 7 $a10.1071/AN18075$2DOI 100 1 $aFERRINHO, A.M. 245 $aEffect of growth path on carcass and meat-quality traits of Hereford steers finished on pasture or in feedlot.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2020 500 $aArticle history: Received 30 January 2018 / Accepted 14 May 2019 / Published online 4 December 2019. Funding information: This work was supported by Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP grant #2016/22022-4 and #2011/21241-0), Brazil, and the National Institute of Agricultural research (INIA) of Uruguay. 520 $aABSTRACT. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of nutritional management during rearing and finishing phases on beef fatty acid composition, and carcass and beef quality traits of Hereford cattle. The study used 240 castrated male calves weaned at 8 months of age, and with an average weight of 170 ± 17 kg. After weaning, the experiment was divided in to three phases in a 4 × 2 factorial design: a 93-day winter period with four treatment groups (on pasture or in feedlot and at high or low feeding levels); a 196-day compensatory-growth phase on pasture; and a finishing phase either on pasture or in feedlot. Animals were slaughtered when each group attained a mean liveweight of 500 kg. The winter growth × finishing management interaction significantly affected hot carcass weight (P = 0.0029). There was no differences observed for feedlot-finished steers, but for pasture-finished steers, those pasture-reared had higher hot carcass weight (kg) than those feedlot-reared (low pasture 256.30 ± 1.60, high pasture 253.72 ± 1.60, low feedlot 249.85 ± 1.66, high feedlot 247.60 ± 1.62). Feedlot-finished steers showed higher (P < 0.05) mean values than pasture-finished steers for ribeye area (55.61 ± 0.69 cm2 vs 53.18 cm2), backfat thickness (8.62 ± 0.32 mm vs 6.21 mm), marbling score (237.97 ± 13.06 vs 171.70) and final pH (5.53 ± 0.02 vs 5.48). Additionally, feedlot-finished steers raised in feedlot during the winter-growth period displayed the heaviest hindquarter cuts. Meat from pasture-finished steers had lower (P < 0.05) shear-force values than from feedlot-finished cattle (2.95 ± 0.18 vs 3.66 ± 0.17 kg), and when reared on either high or low pasture during winter-growth, they showed the highest (P < 0.05) conjugated linoleic acid (cis-9, trans-11) and n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid concentrations. In conclusion, growing and finishing cattle on pasture improved the carcass yield of retail cuts because of low fat concentration, and improved the nutritional and health value of the beef fatty acid profile. © 2020 CSIRO. 653 $aCarry-over effects 653 $aFatty-acid profile 653 $aFinishing system 653 $aGrowth-out 700 1 $aPERIPOLLI, E. 700 1 $aBANCHERO, G. 700 1 $aPEREIRA, A.S.C. 700 1 $aBRITO, G. 700 1 $aLA MANNA, A. 700 1 $aFERNANDEZ, E. 700 1 $aMONTOSSI, F. 700 1 $aKLUSKA, S. 700 1 $aMUELLER, L.F. 700 1 $aBERCHIELLI, T.T. 700 1 $aBALDI, F. 773 $tAnimal Production Science, 2020, Volume 60, Issue 2, Pages 323-332. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1071/AN18075
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
Fecha actual : |
06/02/2018 |
Actualizado : |
06/02/2018 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Informes Agroclimáticos |
Autor : |
GIMÉNEZ, A.; CAL, A.; TISCORNIA, G.; SCHIAVI, C. |
Afiliación : |
AGUSTIN EDUARDO GIMÉNEZ FUREST, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ADRIAN TABARE CAL ALVAREZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; GUADALUPE TISCORNIA TOSAR, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; CARLOS IGNACIO SCHIAVI RAMPELBERG, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
Título : |
Informe agroclimático 2018 - Situación a Enero. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2018 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Montevideo (Uruguay): INIA, 2018. |
Páginas : |
4 p. |
Serie : |
(Informe Agroclimático; 141) |
Idioma : |
Español |
Palabras claves : |
AGROCLIMA; AGROCLIMATOLOGÍA; BOLETIN AGROCLIMÁTICO; CARACTERIZACIÓN AGROCLIMÁTICA; DIRECCION VIENTO; ESTACIONES AGROMETEOROLOGICAS; ESTACIONES AUTOMATICAS; ESTACIONES INIA; ESTADO DEL TIEMPO; ESTRÉS HÍDRICO; GRAFICAS AGROCLIMATICOS; GRAS; HELIOFANOGRAFO; INFORMACION SATELITAL; INFORME AGROCLIMÁTICO 2018; INUNDACIONES; LLUVIAS DIARIAS; MAXIMA; MEDIA; MINIMA; PANEL SOLAR; PERSPECTIVAS CLIMATICAS; PLUVIOMETRO; PRECIPITACION NACIONAL; PREVENCION HELADAS; PRONOSTICO; SENSOR; SIMETRICO; TANQUE A; TERMOCUPLAS; TERMOHIDROGRAFO; VARIABLES AGROCLIMATICAS; VELETA. |
Thesagro : |
AGROCLIMATOLOGIA; CAMBIO CLIMATICO; CLIMA; CLIMATOLOGIA; ESTACIONES METEOROLOGICAS; ESTRES HIDRICO; EVAPORACION; EVAPOTRANSPIRACION; HUMEDAD; HUMEDAD RELATIVA; LLUVIA; METEOROLOGIA; PERSPECTIVAS; PLUVIOMETROS; PRONOSTICO DEL TIEMPO; SENSORES; SISTEMAS; SISTEMAS DE INFORMACION; SUELO; TEMPERATURA; TERMOMETROS. |
Asunto categoría : |
-- |
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/8269/1/Informe-agroclimatico-INIA-GRAS-Enero-de-2018.pdf
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02126nam a2200805 a 4500 001 1058027 005 2018-02-06 008 2018 bl uuuu u0uu1 u #d 100 1 $aGIMÉNEZ, A. 245 $aInforme agroclimático 2018 - Situación a Enero.$h[electronic resource] 260 $aMontevideo (Uruguay): INIA$c2018 300 $a4 p. 490 $a(Informe Agroclimático; 141) 650 $aAGROCLIMATOLOGIA 650 $aCAMBIO CLIMATICO 650 $aCLIMA 650 $aCLIMATOLOGIA 650 $aESTACIONES METEOROLOGICAS 650 $aESTRES HIDRICO 650 $aEVAPORACION 650 $aEVAPOTRANSPIRACION 650 $aHUMEDAD 650 $aHUMEDAD RELATIVA 650 $aLLUVIA 650 $aMETEOROLOGIA 650 $aPERSPECTIVAS 650 $aPLUVIOMETROS 650 $aPRONOSTICO DEL TIEMPO 650 $aSENSORES 650 $aSISTEMAS 650 $aSISTEMAS DE INFORMACION 650 $aSUELO 650 $aTEMPERATURA 650 $aTERMOMETROS 653 $aAGROCLIMA 653 $aAGROCLIMATOLOGÍA 653 $aBOLETIN AGROCLIMÁTICO 653 $aCARACTERIZACIÓN AGROCLIMÁTICA 653 $aDIRECCION VIENTO 653 $aESTACIONES AGROMETEOROLOGICAS 653 $aESTACIONES AUTOMATICAS 653 $aESTACIONES INIA 653 $aESTADO DEL TIEMPO 653 $aESTRÉS HÍDRICO 653 $aGRAFICAS AGROCLIMATICOS 653 $aGRAS 653 $aHELIOFANOGRAFO 653 $aINFORMACION SATELITAL 653 $aINFORME AGROCLIMÁTICO 2018 653 $aINUNDACIONES 653 $aLLUVIAS DIARIAS 653 $aMAXIMA 653 $aMEDIA 653 $aMINIMA 653 $aPANEL SOLAR 653 $aPERSPECTIVAS CLIMATICAS 653 $aPLUVIOMETRO 653 $aPRECIPITACION NACIONAL 653 $aPREVENCION HELADAS 653 $aPRONOSTICO 653 $aSENSOR 653 $aSIMETRICO 653 $aTANQUE A 653 $aTERMOCUPLAS 653 $aTERMOHIDROGRAFO 653 $aVARIABLES AGROCLIMATICAS 653 $aVELETA 700 1 $aCAL, A. 700 1 $aTISCORNIA, G. 700 1 $aSCHIAVI, C.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|